Gender Differences in Numeracy Performance among Grade X Students: A Comparative Study in an Indonesian Islamic Senior High School
Keywords:
Numeracy, Gender Differences, Numeracy Performance, Mathematics Education, Secondary School StudentsAbstract
Numeracy is a fundamental component of mathematical competence, yet empirical evidence regarding gender-related differences in numeracy performance remains inconsistent across educational contexts. This study examined whether numeracy performance differed between male and female Grade X students at SMAIT Nurul Asafa Takalar, an Islamic Integrated Senior High School in Indonesia. A quantitative comparative design was employed involving the entire Grade X cohort of 60 students, comprising 30 male and 30 female students. Data were collected through a numeracy test and analyzed using JASP. The analysis included descriptive statistics, Shapiro–Wilk test (Shapiro & Wilk, 1965)s, the Brown–Forsythe test, an independent-samples t-test, and Cohen’s d effect size. Female students obtained a higher mean numeracy score than male students (78.03 vs. 74.53), representing a mean difference of 3.50 points. However, the independent-samples t-test indicated that the difference was not statistically significant, t(58) = −1.531, p = .131. The standardized mean difference was d = −0.3954 (|d| ≈ 0.40), indicating an observed difference between conventional small and medium effect-size benchmarks. These findings suggest that the descriptive difference in numeracy performance was not sufficient to establish a statistically significant gender difference within the studied cohort. The study contributes context-specific evidence to the mixed literature on gender and numeracy and highlights the importance of interpreting group differences alongside effect size, sample characteristics, and broader learner and instructional factors.
Downloads
References
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Khotimah, K., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2025). Kemampuan siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah numerasi ditinjau berdasarkan gender. MATHEdunesa, 14(2), 600–610. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v14n2.p600-610
Mariamah, Suciyati, & Hendrawan. (2021). Kemampuan numerasi siswa sekolah dasar ditinjau dari jenis kelamin. TUNAS: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 17–19.
Maryam, S., Yulianto, D., & Juniawan, E. A. (2025). Studi komparatif kemampuan numerasi siswa SMP berdasarkan jenis kelamin di Kabupaten Lebak Banten. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 10(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v10i2.26034
Mellyzar, Unaida, R., Muliani, & Novita, N. (2021). Hubungan self-efficacy dan kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa: Ditinjau berdasarkan gender. Lantanida Journal, 9(2), 93–182.
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3–4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333709
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Anderson, J. O., Lin, H.-S., Treagust, D. F., Ross, S. P., & Yore, L. D. (2007). Using large-scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9090-y
Deda, Y. N., Amsikan, S., & Tanujaya, B. (2026). Integrating dryland agriculture into student worksheets to enhance students’ numeracy skills. Mathematics Education Journal, 20(2), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.22342/mej.v20i2.pp349-374
Gal, I., Grotlüschen, A., Tout, D., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: A critical view of a neglected field. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 52(3), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01155-9
Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM–International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1
Hemmings, B., Grootenboer, P., & Kay, R. (2011). Predicting mathematics achievement: The influence of prior achievement and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(3), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9224-5
Hodgen, J., & Noyes, A. (2026). System-level improvement in mathematics education: Re-considering the National Numeracy Strategy in England. Research in Mathematics Education, 28(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2026.2628162
Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017973827514
Leton, S. I., Lakapu, M., Jagom, Y. O., Djong, K. D., Dosinaeng, W. B. N., & Kusuma, D. A. (2026). Integrating augmented reality and local wisdom in teaching exponents: A strategy to improve students’ mathematical literacy. Infinity Journal, 15(3), 901–920. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v15i3.p901-920
Lestari, N. D. S., Pambudi, D. S., Murtafiah, W., Suwarno, Kurniati, D., & Sunardi. (2026). Decision-making skills of prospective mathematics teachers in designing numeracy tasks: A study of medium level pedagogical content knowledge. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 28(1), Article 2.
Maysarah, S., Armanto, D., & Saragih, S. (2026). Integrating ethnomathematics and GeoGebra: A project-based learning approach to improve mathematical literacy. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 18(2), 161–191.
Mejía-Rodríguez, A. M., Luyten, H., & Meelissen, M. R. M. (2021). Gender differences in mathematics self-concept across the world: An exploration of student and parent data of TIMSS 2015. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(6), 1229–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10100-x
Muhaimin, L. H., Dasari, D., Hendriyanto, A., Andriatna, R., & Sahara, S. (2026). Can augmented reality enhance students’ mathematical literacy? A study on technological development for learning practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 57(5), 909–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2025.2502398
Payadnya, P. A. A., Puspadewi, K. R., & Noviana, L. P. R. (2026). AI-assisted adaptive geometry e-learning: Integrating ethno-realistic mathematics education to boost students’ numeracy abilities. STEM Education, 6(3), 392–417. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2026017
Roza, Y., Adnan, A., Indra, Z., & Alawiyah, T. (2026). Correlation analysis of factors associated with students’ numeracy skills using decision tree algorithms. Numeracy, 19(2), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.19.2.1494
Rosita, C. D., Setiyani, Asmara, A. S., Sumarwati, S., & Suprayo, T. (2026). Mathematical thinking processes based on decision-making types in Grade VIII numeracy: Foundations for differentiated instruction in geometry. Journal on Mathematics Education, 17(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v17i1.pp1-26
Sagita, L., Utami, N. W., Dwipa, N. M. S., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Fauzan, A. (2026). Designing a contextual numeracy assessmen
Segers, E., Kleemans, T., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Role of parent literacy and numeracy expectations and activities in predicting early numeracy skills. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(2–3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.1016819
Siregar, P. S., Sofyan, H., Nazurty, & Rosmiati. (2026). Boosting students’ abilities in understanding, application, and reasoning of numeracy: Didactical differentiated learning. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 18(2), 215–241.
Talib, A., Sappaile, B. I., Rahman, M. S., & Nasir, N. (2026). Enhancing secondary students’ mathematical literacy through Android-based modules integrating deep learning and intrapersonal intelligence. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(3), Article em2794. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/18069
Tran, D. (2026). Measuring opportunities to develop mathematical literacy and their prediction on mathematical literacy outcomes. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2026.2652846
Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muh Safar, Dahliah Dahliah, Andi Nabiah Armini (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.